Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Balde

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 00:43, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro Balde

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, never played in a WP:FPL. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 04:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:38, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:38, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:38, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 11:37, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draft Might be one for the future, some info online. Govvy (talk) 18:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - the Goal.com source that just got added looks like good coverage. I can't see much else though so doesn't look to meet the multiple source requirement for GNG just yet. Plausible that he could meet criteria soon so draft space seems appropriate. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep passes GNG, even though he fails NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:49, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep there's GNG coverage out there. Here's another one. Nfitz (talk) 22:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Barely has enough to pass GNG, but there's surely a lot more sources that can be found online, considering the coverage Balde has received in the past year. @Nfitz already provided one source, at least it's a start. Oblow14 (talk) 02:08, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftifty: potential debut this season. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:17, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: there is a good potential that he could meet criteria soon. --Assyrtiko (talk) 06:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Although fails WP:FOOTYN, but he is too young, could possibly meet the GNG soon Mehmood.Husain (talk) 23:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep He has enough coverage to pass GNG, alas in Spanish-language media; that's not a reason to not consider them when assessing GNG. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)Hansi667 (Neighbor Of The Beast) ^{a penny for your thoughts?} 08:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.